|
|
Post by K1power on Mar 17, 2016 11:02:40 GMT 1
|
|
|
|
Post by K1power on May 2, 2016 9:24:56 GMT 1
Happening this saturday, I'm watching this one.
|
|
|
|
Post by themagi on May 3, 2016 15:12:53 GMT 1
Typical Del Boy. In like a lion and when the bell rings, he'll be out like a lamb.
|
|
|
|
Post by K1power on May 8, 2016 10:20:45 GMT 1
Pulev defeats Chisora by Split Decision.
I've only seen bits and pieces of the fight so I can't really comment, but the table covering the fight for the German TV broadcast felt like the one judge who gave it to Chisora was very wrong.
|
|
|
|
Post by themagi on May 8, 2016 15:02:04 GMT 1
Nothing much to see really, I had 119-109 giving Chisora only the ninth. A split decision was totally scandalous, however in boxing present day when you have two fighters promoted by the same team, in this case Pulev and Chisora are both handled by the Sauerland Bros, and the fight goes to the scorecards and is a one sided contest that is pretty much a whitewash then invariably you see these split or majority decisions that do not reflect the dominance of the victorious fighter. It happens too often to be coincidence and opens a can of worms as far as judging is concerned. Why does it happen so often? It's as if it's easier for the vanquished fighter to be brought back on a split or majority decision loss than a unanimous one.
|
|
